JulieS: Or: creating a sense of neighborhood knowledge through digital rights policy
This is essentially a demand to have an easier way to manage group privacy, and potentially to start a framework for multiple people's interacting rights to unilateral deletion of what eventually becomes shared content. Right now privacy policy is largely opt-out, with the onus on the user to create blacklists. This intends to create a starting point that is opt-in, with a usable and understandable whitelist, and then ask permission whenever content virality exceeds those limitations.
Some potential questions this hopes to address:
1. When does my UGC stop being my own and becomes part of a social domain, therefore limiting my own power over it?
2. Something I said/created was intended for a specific audience, and I don't want it to go any further. So I want to preemptively limit the spread of my content, either to n-degree of separation from my initial posting, or a geographic location.
JulieS: Or: creating a sense of neighborhood knowledge through digital rights policy This is essentially a demand to have an easier way to manage group privacy, and potentially to start a framework for multiple people's interacting rights to unilateral deletion of what eventually becomes shared content. Right now privacy policy is largely opt-out, with the onus on the user to create blacklists. This intends to create a starting point that is opt-in, with a usable and understandable whitelist, and then ask permission whenever content virality exceeds those limitations. Some potential questions this hopes to address: 1. When does my UGC stop being my own and becomes part of a social domain, therefore limiting my own power over it? 2. Something I said/created was intended for a specific audience, and I don't want it to go any further. So I want to preemptively limit the spread of my content, either to n-degree of separation from my initial posting, or a geographic location.